Overrated D.C. Restaurants

Piggybacking on a Washingtonian inquiry, Ezra Klein asks commenters for the most overrated restaurant in DC. Ezra says Zatinya and Central; I have to admit I haven’t been to either, but how about Lauriol Plaza?

Sure — great atmosphere and quesadillas — but it’s Mexican food. Not gourmet, not creative, just standard Mexican food. There’s nothing wrong with that of course, but the way people talk about it you’d think the margaritas could cure death. Similarly, Bistro du Coin — though at least the food is better.

Place your picks in comments.

UPDATE: I don’t want to sound like I’m hating on Bistrot du Coin…I think it’s good, but I think anyone who has been there will tell you that without the jovial atmosphere, it wouldn’t be quite the same. (And for the record, it’s not that it’s bad, in fact, it’s definitely above average…but something doesn’t have to be bad to be overrated).

Posted in Culture, D.C.. Tags: , . 6 Comments »

Taxation Perhaps With Limited Representation

Elanor Holmes Norton — D.C.’s non-voting Representative — is quite optimistic that D.C. will be “given the vote” soon enough, though she doesn’t elaborate on what sort of vote D.C. will be given. Obviously, that leaves a lot left unsaid. One vote in the House of Representatives? A proportional number of votes in the House? One Senator? Two Senators? Full statehood?

Ryan Avent thinks it’s smart to push for just one vote now.

I’m a pretty adamant supporter of statehood, but I suspect that the District’s political leaders will not take a risk and go for anything more than the one House vote. That’s probably smart. The thing to do after that, in my mind, is to begin laying the groundwork for a serious push for a full delegation or statehood, in the hopes that a successful couple of years for Obama improves the Senate majority to 60 or more in 2010.

I don’t know. First, I’m not entirely sure why a largely symbolic vote in the House of Representatives would help build any sort of meaningful argument for complete statehood. Second, I’m not sure why Obama should expect to see even more Senators in 2010. It’s likely that the economic situation will not have vastly improved by then, and it will the Democrats turn at unsuccessful incumbent. More importantly though, if Democrats do get to 60 votes on 2010, it’s unclear to me why they couldn’t simply try again if they had first failed.

On a historical note, I’ve learned the District was never granted statehood because the founding fathers judged it imperative that the Federal government be responsible for its own security, so that its functionality wouldn’t depend on a particular state. Why this would result in the city’s residents inability to vote for direct representation eludes me.

Blame not the Jews, but the Virginia drivers, Armenians

In an article at The Washington Examiner, Taryn Luntz reports on the 2008 Allstate America’s Best Drivers report which shows that D.C. is the most accident prone city in the nation. Virginia not surprisingly, is close behind, probably tailgating even though they don’t know where they’re going. Alexandria and Arlington rank as the 11th and 13th most dangerous.

The criteria for “dangerous” is how many years, on average, pass between accidents per city resident. D.C. drivers average an accident every 5.4 years. Alexandra and Arlington drivers crash every 7 and 7.1 years, respectively. By contrast, the “safest” city in which to drive is Sioux Falls, SD, where drivers collide every 14.6 years. The cause, apparently, is bacterial.

“All three of those areas [D.C., Alexandria, and Arlington] suffer from the same affliction: gridlockitis,” AAA Mid-Atlantic spokesman John Townsend said. “And that has many side effects, including wrecks.”

Yeah, and the fact that asshole Virginia drivers flood the streets!

Jabs about terrible Virginia drivers aside, this isn’t at all surprising. D.C. is a fairly populous city, and unlike other denser cities like N.Y., a lot of people own cars and even more people commute into the city by car — so much so that D.C. has recently taken measures to tip the balance in favor of its residents. Or in their own selfish words, “putting the needs of its residents and businesses before those of suburban commuters and that they are trying to create a walkable, bikeable, transit-oriented metropolis.”

Anyway, I guess my point is that this kind of study doesn’t really say much about D.C. drivers as much as much as it does the sort of driving that takes place in D.C. Reduce that sort of driving (add more viable mass transit options, or otherwise create a “walkable, bikeable, transit-oriented metropolis”), and you’ll reduce accidents. This is not true for the second most dangerous city, Glendale, CA, which owes its accident vulnerability to the long-held (and truthful) stereotype that Armenians are horrendous drivers.

I’ll add that despite 8 years of driving in/around the dangerous streets of the worst (D.C.) and 7th most (Philadelphia) unsafe cities to drive in, yours truly is accident free. Knock on wood.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.