Like I said, he’s a realist.
[...] The article also mentions the possibility of keeping Gates at Defense as further evidence of a “shift”, but misses the obvious conclusion that agreement doesn’t constitute a “shift.” [...]
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
November 22, 2008 at 1:17 pm
[...] The article also mentions the possibility of keeping Gates at Defense as further evidence of a “shift”, but misses the obvious conclusion that agreement doesn’t constitute a “shift.” [...]